Bi-weekly Round up: 17th January 2022
Another look at topical, ethical issues arising recently from media sources and journal articles. Bear this statement in mind when having a read of the below articles: ‘Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should’- Is there any truth in this statement?
1. Man gets genetically-modified pig heart in world-first transplant
Pioneering procedure sure to raise numerous ethical issues surrounding the controversial practice of xenotransplantation
2. The ethics of a second chance: Pig heart transplant recipient stabbed a man seven times years ago
Following on from the above case, further information has come to light regarding the alleged criminal background of the transplant patient. Is it relevant? How much consideration should be given to a patient’s criminal record/past transgressions, when recruiting patients for progressive, experimental procedures? Is fairness important? Does one need to ‘deserve’ it?
3. “Wrongful conception” ruling against UK general practitioner
Fantastic analysis and discussion surrounding the case of a GP providing periconceptual advice and failing to give clear advice on the role of folic acid prior and during pregnancy.
And finally, one for those with IME membership (Sign up here).
4. Appropriately framing maternal request caesarean section
A paper in response to ‘How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power’. A well-written piece, encouraging further discussion and consideration on the views of maternal request caesarean sections and the varying perceptions between clinicians and birthing people, when considering the benefits.